Volvo 240
Power hp
Torque Nm
Displacement L
Layout
Swap overview with verified parts, part numbers and sources.
LS1 in Volvo 240.
Documented from 42 recorded sources: 6 of the ten mandatory blocks are carried by two independent publishers, 2 remain open. Internal confidence 71%.
Small-block GM V8, 90 degrees, two valves per cylinder, single camshaft in the block with pushrods, aluminium heads on either an aluminium or an iron block. LS1 5.7 l aluminium (Gen III), LM7 5.3 l cast iron (Gen III), LS3 6.2 l aluminium (Gen IV). Gen III runs a 24x crank trigger wheel with the cam sensor at the rear of the camshaft; Gen IV runs 58x with the cam sensor in the timing chain cover. Two practical consequences on this chassis rather than on the engine stand. First, the accessory drive is a fitment item in its own right: one completed car runs an LS1 power steering pump on an ICT bracket, and another build had to move the alternator off its factory position because it fouled the ABS pump and its line. Second, the intake manifold decides the bonnet: two independent vendors warn that a truck intake and its accessories clear everything except a flat bonnet, where a Corvette-style manifold is required instead. Bore, stroke, factory output and engine weight are deliberately absent - no reachable source gave figures that two publishers carry.
Status: VERIFIED · Confidence 82%
All three are naturally aspirated in the form in which they are being swapped: no reachable source lists factory forced induction for the LS1, the LM7 or the LS3, and the supercharged member of the Gen IV group is named separately as the LSA. That ma
CORRECTION vs. earlier Swaplements data: an earlier internal extraction of the Gen III/IV overview gave the LM7 as 4.8 litres and the LS3 as 5.7 litres. Both are wrong - 4.8 litres is the LR4, the LM7 is 5.3 and the LS3 is 6.2 - and the figures used here are taken from a second publisher's table instead. Pick the donor by generation first, then by what the car is for. The documented route on this chassis is overwhelmingly a GM truck or SUV: both completed 5.3-litre 240s found here came out of one - a 2000 Silverado (LM7, iron block) and a 2004 Envoy (aluminium 5.3) - and in both cases the 4L60E came with the engine. That is the cheap, well-trodden path, and it has a specific advantage that is documented rather than assumed: a 1999-or-later 4L60E is a direct bolt-on to a Gen III engine, so buying engine and gearbox from one donor removes the flexplate and crank-spacer question entirely. The LS1 route buys the same Gen III electronics in an aluminium block, i.e. the same loom strategy with less weight over the front axle. The LS3 route is the expensive one in wiring terms, not in engine terms: Gen IV means 58x, drive-by-wire with a pedal position sensor, a matching ECU, and - if an automatic is wanted - a 2007-or-later 15- or 17-pin transmission. Buy the donor complete: engine, its own ECU, its own loom, and, if going automatic, its gearbox.
The shopping list splits in three and is unusually well defined for this chassis. Buy from the GM donor: engine, its own ECU, its own engine harness, the accessory drive, and - if going automatic - the 4L60E that came with it (a 1999-or-later one for a Gen III engine). Buy as swap-specific hardware: the 240 engine mounts (four suppliers, 209 to 350 USD or 349.95 EUR), a retro-fit rear-sump oil pan matched to those mounts, cast exhaust manifolds that clear the steering shaft (285 USD), the gearbox mount for T56/4L60/CD009 (190 USD), the replacement tubular steering shaft (65 USD), the 90-degree heater core fitting through the bulkhead (85 USD), the heavy-duty propshaft centre bearing (80 USD), the LS coolant temperature sender for the Volvo gauge (60 USD) and, for a manual, the hydraulic clutch pedal kit (195 USD). A complete manual package with mounts, gearbox mount, hydraulic clutch pedal kit, steering shaft, heater fitting, cast headers and the oil pan is sold at 1,600 USD, left-hand drive only, and explicitly does NOT include the propshaft or the radiator. Buy separately as chassis parts: a radiator (500 USD for the aftermarket route, or a 1994 940 radiator and fan from the Volvo parts bin), an electric fan set-up (225 USD), an external fuel pump with dash-6 lines and, if the power justifies it, a Ford 8.8 with the 240 bracket set (200 USD). All prices are as of 31 July 2026.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 74%
This is a solved problem with off-the-shelf hardware from at least four independent suppliers, which for a chassis this obscure is unusual. Three American vendors sell 240-specific LS mounts - one at 350 USD in powder-coated carbon steel with Energy Suspension polyurethane bushes, one as ICT Billet kit EM-LS-VLV1 in powder-coated tubular steel with polyurethane bushes and explicitly listed for the 1974-1993 240, and a third at 209 USD which states plainly that the mounts 'bolt in directly to the stock crossmember'. A European supplier sells a fourth design at 349.95 EUR in 5 mm galvanised steel with double bushes per side, and this one adds the detail the others omit: the mount plates carry a row of holes along the car's length so the engine can be moved towards or away from the bulkhead and put back in the same place after removal. One caveat that the first vendor states and that must not be lost: the mounts alone do not make the engine fit. That vendor sells them explicitly alongside its own oil pan 'to clear the cross member' and its own cast iron headers 'to clear the body and steering shaft' - i.e. mounts, sump and manifolds are one geometric package, not three separate purchases. A completed 1977 242 with an LM7 confirms the route by running the STS mounts. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
The stock GM sump does not go in, and every publisher agrees on that while offering a different pan for it. The problem is stated twice, from two directions: a truck pan will not clear the transmission tunnel, and the front crossmember sits where the sump wants to be. Four documented answers exist. A 240-specific cast aluminium rear-sump pan at 325 USD, sold as fitting 'all Gen 3 and 4 engines' and stated to 'clear the stock crossmember without any modifications', using a 2016 6.2 Camaro oil filter. A mount vendor that specifies Holley 302-2 or 302-3, or TSP 81073 or 81075, as the pans its mounts are cut for. A European mount vendor that specifies the Summit SUM-G3610 pan and says openly that the front crossmember has to be ground for clearance, offering a finished cover plate for the ground area. And two completed or in-progress cars, one on a TSP 81074 aluminium rear-sump pan, the other on a Holley 302. So the honest summary is: a retro-fit rear-sump pan is mandatory, the choice of pan is not free but tied to which mounts were bought, and only one of the four routes claims to need no chassis modification at all. Nothing reachable described the pickup tube, baffling, oil volume or surge behaviour in this installation. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
The manual route is the Tremec T56, and it is the gearbox the 240-specific hardware is built around: the complete swap package is sold as a 'T56 Manual Swap' and the 240 gearbox mount is listed for the T56 alongside the 4L60 and the Nissan CD009. A 240 build running an aluminium 5.3 confirms the T56 in the car. The 240's own gearboxes (M45, M46 with overdrive, M47) are not part of this route and are not adapted. One documented alternative exists for the 200-series but not for this engine: a Borg-Warner World Class T5 from a 1985-1993 Mustang 5.0 goes in place of the M46/M47, which is worth knowing because it establishes that the Ford-pattern gearbox family fits the tunnel - but that conversion keeps the Volvo four-cylinder and says nothing about an LS bellhousing. Nothing reachable gave T56 variant codes, input shaft specifications, bellhousing part numbers or a torque rating for this application.
A dedicated 240 gearbox mount is sold for the T56 at 190 USD, made from quarter-inch steel plate with welded gussets and powder coated, and covering the 4L60 and CD009 as well (1Q). Whether it bolts to the standard Volvo crossmember or needs welding is not stated on the product page and was not established anywhere. The only reachable description of how a foreign gearbox is actually mounted in a 200-series car comes from a different conversion entirely - a T5 behind the Volvo four, using a Ford mount (NAPA 620-1091) on a modified Volvo crossmember with a 4 by 6 inch steel plate welded to its underside - which shows that the standard crossmember is a modification candidate rather than an obstacle, but proves nothing about the T56 behind an LS. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
Status: SINGLE_SOURCE · Confidence 48%
No reliable combination-specific information found on shifter, shifter carrier, tunnel opening or lever position for the T56 in the Volvo 240.
Status: OPEN
The clutch actuation is converted, not carried over, and that is the single most useful manual-side finding in this dataset. The 240's own clutch is cable-operated - a T5 conversion behind the Volvo four keeps that cable and its return spring - but every LS-with-T56 route found here goes hydraulic instead: a 240-specific hydraulic clutch pedal kit is sold at 195 USD and is part of the complete swap package, and a builder running a T56 behind an aluminium 5.3 describes converting to a hydraulic clutch using the factory pedal box provisions. So the pedal box stays, the actuation changes. No source gave the clutch disc, pressure plate, flywheel, slave cylinder type (concentric or external) or a torque rating for any of it - which means the part of the clutch that actually transmits the torque is undocumented while the part that operates it is well documented. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 68%
This is the first dataset in the series with a genuinely documented automatic route, and it is the GM 4L60E - which for a Gen III donor is simply the gearbox that came bolted to the engine. Two completed cars run it: a 1977 242 with an LM7 uses the 4L60E out of the same 2000 two-wheel-drive Silverado as the engine, and a 1990 240 DL uses a rebuilt 4L60E from an Envoy XL with a custom-made shift linkage. A third, in-progress LM7 car is also going 4L60E. The 240-specific gearbox mount is explicitly listed for the 4L60 as well as the T56. On the interface, the guidance is specific: a 1999-or-later 4L60E is a direct bolt-on to a Gen III LS/Vortec engine, and 4L60E, 4L65E, 4L70E and 4L75E are electronically identical for a given year and pin count. For a Gen IV LS3 the correct choice is a 2007-or-later 15- or 17-pin unit. Note what the sources do NOT say: no torque rating for the 4L60E is given anywhere, and the two heavily-boosted 240s went to a 4L80E and a TH400 respectively - i.e. the 4L60E is documented as the stock-power answer, not as a high-power one.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 74%
No adapter plate is involved - engine and gearbox are a factory GM pairing, and that is the whole point of taking both from one donor. The one interface caveat that is documented concerns older gearboxes: 4L60E units of model years 1996 to 1998 need a dished flexplate (on the 4.8 and 5.3 litre engines) and a crankshaft spacer, while 1999-and-later units bolt straight to a Gen III engine (1Q). A completed 242 illustrates the clean case by taking engine and 4L60E from the same 2000 Silverado. Nothing was found on torque converter selection, stall speed or flexplate part numbers for this installation.
Status: SINGLE_SOURCE · Confidence 50%
The same 240-specific gearbox mount that carries the T56 is listed for the 4L60 at 190 USD - quarter-inch steel plate with welded gussets, powder coated, for the 1975-1993 240. The two completed automatic cars did it differently from each other and from the vendor: one runs a custom transmission mount with an Energy Suspension polyurethane bush, the other a T5 polyurethane transmission mount. So three solutions exist for the same job and none of them is the Volvo's original mount. What none of the three sources describes is what happens to the standard Volvo crossmember underneath - whether it is reused, drilled or modified. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 62%
Behind the 4L60E the Volvo's own two-piece propshaft is retained, and this is the best-documented drivetrain detail of the automatic route. A completed 1977 242 with an LM7 runs a 'two piece driveline with heavy duty center support bearing'; an in-progress LM7 car states the same plan - the Volvo 240 two-piece shaft with a 4L60E slip yoke at the front; and a heavy-duty centre support bearing for the 1975-1993 240 is sold as a swap part at 80 USD, which is what makes the retained-shaft route a supported product rather than an improvisation. So the work is at the front joint (a gearbox-side slip yoke to suit the 4L60E) and at the centre bearing, not at the shaft as a whole. Note the contrast with the manual side, where the only documented solution replaces the two-piece shaft with a one-piece unit - and note that the complete swap package explicitly excludes the propshaft either way. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
Status: VERIFIED · Confidence 80%
The 4L60E is electronically controlled and there is no mechanical fallback: shift control comes either from a factory GM PCM or from a standalone transmission controller, and the electrical generation has to match the engine's - 13-pin gearboxes (1996-2006) belong to Gen III systems, 15- and 17-pin gearboxes (2007-2008 and 2009 onwards) are described as the right choice for 58x Gen IV applications. In practice both completed 240s solve it by keeping the donor's own control: one runs the GM ECU as a standalone flashed with HP Tuners, with the transmission cooler plumbed in dash-6 braided lines to an external cooler, the other a reprogrammed GM ECU from the same Envoy the gearbox came out of. The aftermarket route - dedicated 4L60E standalone controllers - exists and is sold by the same publisher that documents the interface, but no 240 build found here used one. Nothing reachable gave shift point tuning, line pressure or a gearbox temperature strategy for this installation.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 68%
Transferred from a different gearbox combination in the same vehicle: the only reachable description of a driveshaft for a non-standard gearbox in the Volvo 200 series comes from a T5 conversion behind the Volvo four-cylinder. There the standard TWO-PIECE shaft is replaced by a one-piece 3-inch shaft, measured from the rear end of the output shaft to the flange at the differential, with a universal joint at the front matched to the gearbox slip yoke and the Volvo differential flange at the rear. The transfer is plausible because the measuring point, the differential flange and the tunnel are chassis-side and do not depend on the engine. What it does NOT establish: the length for a T56, whether the two-piece shaft can also remain behind the T56 (behind the 4L60E it demonstrably does), and which slip yoke fits. It is additionally documented that a reinforced centre bearing for the two-piece 240 shaft is available on the market as a conversion part.
The 240's own rear end is a live axle, and in this swap it is the component with the clearest documented threshold. A completed 1977 242 with an LM7 keeps the standard axle and describes it as a '1031 stock dana 30 rear open diff good for over 300 hp' - an open differential, retained, with a figure attached. Above that level the documented cars change axle rather than strengthen it: the 613 whp twin-turbo 240 runs a Ford 8.8 and the 8.95-second car a Ford 9 inch, and the same vendor that sells the mounts also sells a bracket set to fit a Ford 8.8 into the 240 chassis at 200 USD, plus a welding jig for it at 125 USD. That is a coherent picture with an honest hole in the middle: nobody documents what happens between roughly 300 hp and 600 hp, and the 300 hp figure is a seller's claim in a for-sale listing rather than a tested rating. Final drive ratios, limited-slip options for the Volvo axle and the axle's behaviour behind the LS torque curve were not established at all. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 66%
Both completed cars replace the fuel supply rather than adapt it, and both do the same thing: an external high-flow pump feeding braided lines in dash-6 size. One runs a genuine Walbro 350 with a full dash-6 system, the other a DeatschWerks pump with Fragola lines and a Russell filter. Neither publisher gave fuel pressure, injector flow, tank modifications or whether the 240's factory tank and sender survive the conversion - and that last point is a known gap, because the one reachable thread title dealing with the 240's fuel gauge wiring after an LS swap was blocked.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 62%
Two documented routes, and neither is a carry-over of the 240's own radiator. The first is the aftermarket route: a Northern aluminium radiator sold for the 240/740/940 with an LS at 500 USD, single row, driver-side inlet, passenger-side outlet, with an integral transmission oil cooler - and a build using a Northern aluminium radiator reports that it 'is the biggest one that will fit without cutting', which is the sentence that turns a product listing into a fitment statement. The second is the parts-bin route: a completed 1977 242 runs the radiator and electric fan of a 1994 Volvo 940 with the fan switched by the GM ECU. An in-progress car used a Nissan 240SX KA dual-row radiator instead, so the choice is clearly open. Two further items are specific to this chassis and easy to miss: the LS heads' steam vent ports (a quarter-inch barb) have to be adapted and routed to the Volvo expansion tank, which one builder had to solve with adapters, and the heater circuit needs a 90-degree fitting through the 240 bulkhead, sold as a dedicated part at 85 USD. A complete electric fan set-up for the 240/740 is sold at 225 USD. Nothing reachable gave a thermostat specification or reported an overheating outcome either way. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
Not applicable to this combination: none of the three commissioned engine variants is factory forced-induction, and no combination-specific charge piping was documented.
The driver's-side exhaust is the second geometric fight of this swap after the sump, and three publishers name the same cause independently: the steering shaft runs where the driver's-side exhaust ports are. The European mount vendor states it as the reason narrow cast manifolds are required on a naturally aspirated build (and notes that turbo builds route forward and have an easier time of it); the American mount vendor sells its own cast iron manifolds explicitly 'to clear the body and steering shaft' at 285 USD, and sells a replacement steel tube steering shaft at 65 USD alongside them, which tells you the clearance is tight enough to change the shaft as well. Both completed cars use cast manifolds rather than tubular headers - one on Hooker cast iron with 2.5 inch downpipes stepping to a 3 inch system with a Magnaflow muffler, the other on Hooker Block Huggers with a 2.25 inch system, a Magnaflow muffler and a two-into-one catalytic converter. The retained catalytic converter on that second car is the only emissions-related hardware detail found anywhere in this run and matters directly for the German case. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
The loom is the biggest single job and the documented strategy is uniform across every completed car: take the donor's own engine harness and its own ECU, strip the harness to what the engine needs, and have the ECU reprogrammed. One car runs a re-pinned Envoy harness with a reprogrammed GM ECU and, notably, extensive added engine-to-chassis grounding; another runs the GM ECU as a standalone with HP Tuners and an OBD-II socket wired into the car; a third stripped a truck harness to essentials, reflashed the stock ECM and fed the car through a six-circuit Bussmann fuse panel. A fourth, far more heavily modified car went the other way and fitted a Holley Terminator X. The generation split decides how much of this there is: Gen III (LS1, LM7) is 24x with a throttle cable, so the pedal side is mechanical and a Lokar cable for the 240 chassis is sold at 100 USD; Gen IV (LS3) is 58x with drive-by-wire, which adds the pedal position sensor, its wiring and an ECU programmed for it. Mixing the two - a cable throttle body on a drive-by-wire ECU, for instance - is named explicitly as a cause of sensor mismatch and poor driveability. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
The immobiliser is not a workaround here but a deletion, and it is deleted in the donor's ECU rather than in the Volvo: one completed car is described as running a reprogrammed GM ECU with VATS, Pass-Key and the emissions monitoring removed, another runs the GM ECU as a standalone flashed with HP Tuners. The Volvo has no engine-side immobiliser to defeat in this direction - the problem is entirely on the GM side. On the instruments, only one concrete item is documented: a coolant temperature sender sold specifically to drive the 240's gauge from an LS at 60 USD, i.e. the factory gauge is retained and fed from a swap-specific sender rather than replaced. One completed car also has the GM ECU switching the electric fan, which is the same principle applied to an output rather than an input. What is NOT documented and remains a real gap: the tachometer signal, the speedometer drive, the fuel gauge and sender, and the warning lamps. On a related Volvo 200 gearbox swap the speedometer is named as the awkward item - a cable-driven speedometer needs a custom solution and an electronic one needs the gearbox output blanked - but that is a different gearbox and a different engine and is offered here only as the direction to look. All prices quoted in this field are as of 31 July 2026.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 64%
Two positions exist here and both are worth knowing, because they are not the same question. On the road-going end, a completed 1977 242 with an LM7 runs the STANDARD brake system, refreshed with new discs, pads and calipers, together with IPD lowering springs, KYB dampers and a 25 mm 'V8 drop' anti-roll bar - i.e. that builder treated the brakes as adequate and spent the money on the front-end geometry the heavier engine changes. On the upgrade end, a Volvo specialist sells a 240 front conversion built around the factory Brembo hardware of the 2004-2007 S60 R and V70 R: 330 mm coated discs, replica R calipers with adapter brackets, braided lines, requiring a minimum 17 inch wheel and the removal of the dust shields plus minor rework of the front hard lines. It is front-axle only and it is not sold as an LS-swap part. Between the two sits the German inspection view, which is not a tuning opinion but the criterion the car will be measured against: where engine output is increased, the brakes may have to be strengthened and the suspension adapted to the changed performance. A drift-oriented 240 build additionally documents the chassis end - adjustable torque rods and anti-roll bar links on rod ends, boxed lower control arms, a stainless Panhard rod after the original cracked, spherical axle bearings and a welded differential - which is a different use case but shows which parts of the 240 rear end are the ones people reinforce.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 66%
Six documented problem areas, and unusually for this series most of them come from builders rather than from vendors. First, the sump against the road and the tunnel: the truck oil pan will not clear the transmission tunnel, and the front crossmember is where the sump wants to be - three vendors sell three different pans for it and one of them requires grinding the crossmember. Second, the steering shaft against the driver's-side exhaust ports, which forces narrow cast manifolds and, on at least one supplier's route, a replacement steering shaft as well. Third, the bonnet: a truck intake manifold and its accessories clear everything except a flat bonnet, where a Corvette-style manifold is needed - named independently by two vendors. Fourth, the alternator fouling the ABS pump and its line in the factory accessory position, which one builder solved by relocating it and converting to a manual belt tensioner. Fifth, the cooling plumbing: the LS heads' quarter-inch steam vent barbs have to be adapted and routed to the Volvo expansion tank, which took adapters and several attempts, and the radiator that fits without cutting sheet metal is the largest one that will go in - there is no margin. Sixth, and this one is a genuine failed attempt: on the turbo route, off-the-shelf 'up and forward' manifolds did not fit and the builder ended up fabricating sheet metal manifolds after several iterations, one side using a truck manifold flipped upwards. Two smaller notes worth having: one heavily modified 240 ran without power steering at all, and two of the three build threads found here end unfinished rather than in a completed car.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 74%
No reliable combination-specific information found on any actually completed German approval or registration of an LS conversion in the Volvo 240.
Status: OPEN
Germany, as of July 2026. Starting position: the Volvo 240 was built from summer 1974 to spring 1993 and had, from the factory, exclusively four-cylinder petrol engines plus the D24 and D5 diesels, with an output range of 79 to 155 PS; this vehicle never had a V8 or a petrol six-cylinder, and the V6 belonged to the 260 built in parallel. Each of the three target engines therefore installs an engine that was never type-approved in this vehicle, and multiplies the output. First, the conversion as such: TUV SUD expressly names engine tuning as a modification requiring inspection and states that the Betriebserlaubnis may lapse in the case of modifications that "may be expected to endanger other road users, change the vehicle category, or worsen emissions or noise behaviour"; a modification report under § 19 StVZO may be required even where an ABE, EC marking or Teilegutachten exists. The same publisher expressly names the consequential requirement: "If engine output is increased, the brakes may have to be uprated and the suspension adapted to the changed performance." Second, the route of individual approval: TUV Rheinland lists vehicles with conversions for special purposes as well as imported vehicles without EC type approval as § 21 StVZO cases, states that such reports may be produced only by officially recognised experts of a technical inspection authority, and summarises: no registration without a positive report. The import aspect is not theoretical here, because the donor engines and conversion parts come predominantly from the USA. Third, the classic-vehicle route, which is an obvious consideration with this vehicle and which is presented here expressly as a CALCULATION and not as a result: the H-Kennzeichen under § 23 StVZO requires an age of more than 30 years and an overall condition worth preserving, whereby "period repair work or conversions (within ten years of first registration) are acceptable". Production ends in 1993, so the vehicle is consistently more than 30 years old and eligible under § 23 on age grounds. The ten-year window, however, extends only to about 2003 even for a vehicle first registered in 1993, and the three engines date from 1997 onwards (LS1), from the Gen III truck era (LM7) and from 2008 onwards (LS3) - the LS3 lies unambiguously outside, LS1 and LM7 fall inside the window by calculation only for the very latest vehicles. This calculation follows from the documented figures, but is drawn by no source for this combination and therefore remains open. What was expressly NOT clarified in this run, and is the real sticking point: the emissions classification of a US V8 without European type approval in this vehicle, and the resulting key numbers. The only documented emissions-relevant hardware finding from the entire run is that one of the two completed vehicles retained a two-into-one catalytic converter - a US vehicle, with no statement whatsoever about a German approval.
Status: SUPPORTED · Confidence 64%
All prices as of 31.07.2026. STS Machining - Complete LS V8 240 Volvo T56 Manual Swap (engine mounts, T56 gearbox mount, hydraulic clutch pedal set, steering shaft, 90-degree heater fitting, LS cast manifolds, cast aluminium oil pan), USD 1,600.00, left-hand drive only, without driveshaft and without radiator (https://www.stsmachininginc.com/products/complete-ls-v8-240-volvo-t56-manual-swap) || STS Machining - 240 Volvo LSx motor mounts LHD, USD 350.00 (https://www.stsmachininginc.com/products/copy-of-240-volvo-lsx-motor-mounts) || STS Machining - T56 / 4L60 / CD009 gearbox mount for the 240, 1975-1993, USD 190.00 (https://www.stsmachininginc.com/products/t56-t5-transmission-mount-for-volvo-240-v8-swap) || STS Machining - retro-fit LSX aluminium rear-sump oil pan for 240 and 740, Gen 3 and Gen 4, USD 325.00 (https://www.stsmachininginc.com/products/retro-fit-lsx-aluminum-rear-sump-oil-pan-fits-240-and-740-chassis) || STS Machining - Northern aluminium radiator for 240/740/940 with LS, with transmission oil cooler, USD 500.00 (https://www.stsmachininginc.com/products/northern-radiator-ls-swap-or-redblock-240-740-940-series) || STS Machining - individual items from the 240 LS collection page: steering shaft USD 65.00, heater fitting USD 85.00, hydraulic clutch pedal set USD 195.00, reinforced driveshaft centre bearing USD 80.00, coolant temperature sender USD 60.00, Lokar throttle cable USD 100.00, electric fan assembly USD 225.00, cast manifolds USD 285.00, Ford 8.8 bracket set USD 200.00, welding jig for it USD 125.00 (https://www.stsmachininginc.com/collections/test-740) || ICT Billet EM-LS-VLV1 - LS swap engine mount kit for the Volvo 240 of model years 1974-1993, tubular steel with polyurethane bushings, price not stated on the page retrieved (https://www.jegs.com/i/ICT-Billet/335/EM-LS-VLV1/10002/-1) || Giffins Performance - 240 LS engine mounts, bolt directly to the standard crossmember, designed for Holley 302-2/302-3 or TSP 81073/81075, USD 209.00, made to order (https://giffinsperformance.com/product-page/240LS) || LucaCarMods (NL) - Volvo 240 LSx/Vortec/LM7/LQ4 engine mounts, 5 mm steel, slotted holes for longitudinal position, gearbox mount AS-002008-01 separate, recommended oil pan Summit SUM-G3610, EUR 349.95 (https://lucacarmods.com/shop/engine/motorswaps-en/volvo-240-lsx-v8-en/volvo-240-lsx-vortec-lm7-lq4-v8-motorsteunen/?lang=en) || IPD - R Big Brake Conversion Kit 240, 330 mm discs with R replica calipers based on the S60 R / V70 R, front axle only, minimum 17-inch wheels, item 115270, currently not available, price not stated (https://www.ipdusa.com/products/4969/R-Big-Brake-Conversion-Kit-240-Models-for-Volvo-Various-Kit)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfvFRhi6mno | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u69HQksxXsc | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9QmQ930Am8
No usable Instagram finding in two dedicated search runs. Concrete search terms for manual follow-up: 'volvo 240 ls swap', 'ls240', 'lsvolvo', '240 ls swap wagon', 'volvo 245 ls'.
http://davidsclassiccars.com/volvo/335229-1977-volvo-242-v8-lm7-53-ls-swapped-240-video-walkaround.html | https://dailyturismo.com/ls-v8-swapped-1990-volvo-240-dl/ | https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/1986-volvo-240dl-lstruck-motor-swap-4l60e-fender-flares-with-burn-outs-to-come/149725/page1/ | https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/build-projects-and-project-cars/can-i-build-a-twin-turbo-ls-swapped-volvo-240-in-a/175980/page1/ | https://stanceworks.com/forums/forum/style/builds/72289-volvo-240-story-ls-swap | https://www.aaronreedbaker.com/t5swap.html | https://www.flagmotorsports.com/tech/identifying-generations-of-ls-engines | https://www.holley.com/blog/post/gen_iii_gen_iv_ls_engine_specs_dimensions_and_engine_history/ | https://www.psiconversion.com/news/DrivebyWire-vs-DrivebyCable-LS-Harness-Which-Should-You-Use-.html | https://www.psiconversion.com/LSXGuide/transguide.html | https://www.motorbiscuit.com/twin-turbo-ls-swapped-volvo-yeah-you-read-that-right/ | https://engineswapdepot.com/?p=34788 | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volvo_240 | https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/marken-modelle/volvo/240/technische-daten/ | https://www.tuvsud.com/de-de/branchen/mobilitaet-und-automotive/tuning-eintragungen-und-aenderungsabnahmen | https://www.tuv.com/germany/de/einzelabnahme.html | https://www.tuv.com/germany/de/kfz-gutachten/oldtimer-h-kennzeichen.html
42 findings from 29 hosts, mapping to 29 publisher keys - the programmatic check found not a single false collision, i.e. no key under which different operators collapse together. 34 findings are reachable, 8 are not. 28 findings are used in substance and cited in fields; they are spread across 20 publisher keys. 8 findings are German-language, of which 7 reachable - worse than 013 (12 German, 9 reachable) and explicable from the vehicle: the Volvo 240 is common in Germany, the LS conversion in it is not, and of the 8 German findings 3 are general legal sources and 3 are vehicle data sheets. 19 search runs; every finding used was opened and read. The record is carried by four mutually independent mount suppliers from three countries (stsmachininginc.com, jegs.com for ICT Billet, giffinsperformance.com, lucacarmods.com), two COMPLETED and fully itemised vehicles (davidsclassiccars.com with an LM7 in a 242, dailyturismo.com with an LM4 in a 240 DL), three build threads (grassrootsmotorsports.com twice, stanceworks.com), three engine and wiring specialist sources (flagmotorsports.com, holley.com, psiconversion.com twice), three vehicle data sheets (de.wikipedia.org, auto-motor-und-sport.de, auto-data.net), a Volvo specialist dealer on brakes (ipdusa.com), a gearbox guide for the 200 series (aaronreedbaker.com) and three German legal sources (tuvsud.com, tuv.com twice). Five notes on the counting, unusually important this time. FIRST, the concentration at one supplier: SIX findings come from stsmachininginc.com and are ONE publisher. That is not a false collision but a genuine multiple entry - yet it is this record's greatest clustering risk, and for that reason no field with VERIFIED or SUPPORTED rests on STS alone; each draws in at least one further independent publisher. SECOND, and more serious, the mirror trap in a new form: speedingparts.com (Sweden) and lucacarmods.com (Netherlands) look like two publishers and formally are, but they distribute THE SAME product with the same part numbers (AS-001019-01, AS-002008-01, AS-001019-02), the same oil pan recommendation (Summit SUM-G3610), the same note about grinding the front subframe and the same steering-column finding. Under § 2 that is one source, not two - the express COUNTER-CASE to 013, where two German dealers sold two DIFFERENT oil pans from two manufacturers with differing dimensions and prices and therefore counted as independent. Only lucacarmods is cited here; speedingparts appears in the source list but is carried as a second publisher in no field. THIRD, the genuine multiple entries: psiconversion.com with two pages, tuv.com with two pages, motor-talk.de with two threads, grassrootsmotorsports.com with two threads, turbobricks.com with two threads and holley.com with two pages - one publisher each. With holley.com this deserves particular attention, because one page was used and the other was unreachable. FOURTH, the host trap: vintagemetalworks.blogspot.com normalises to 'blogspot.com', i.e. to the host rather than the operator; harmless, because it is the only blogspot finding and was unreachable anyway. FIFTH: the multi-part TLD trap expected during preliminary research (.com.au at performancewholesale) did NOT materialise, because that source was not needed - the displacement question was settled by flagmotorsports.com. Fourteen findings remain uncited: the eight unreachable ones, the three YouTube links (per § 5 not technical evidence) and three reachable ones deliberately not used - speedingparts.com as a mirror of the lucacarmods product, and both motor-talk threads, one of which describes a first-generation Chevrolet small block rather than an LS and the other of which concerns VW vehicles and consists of unsupported user reports. Those are at the same time the only three reachable findings of the run that go unused. The reason for the remaining gaps can be named and lies with three sites. Turbobricks.com, the large Volvo performance forum, returned only the board index in two attempts across two sessions and thereby cost the only combination-exact problem thread ('1990 Volvo 240 LS swap (5.3 4L60E) questions') and the cooling collection thread - mandatory block 9 and the radiator question lie precisely there. Ls1tech.com was blocked with HTTP 403 and cost the parts procurement list. Holley.com returned only navigation structure for its own build report 'Wicked Wagon'. Added to that were volvoforums.com with HTTP 403 (the fuel gauge and instrument question lay there), 240turbo.com with a JavaScript redirect (the standard brake dimensions lay there), vintagemetalworks.blogspot.com with an https/http redirect loop, and oldtimer-foren.de with HTTP 404.
Type
Power
Torque
ECU